Thou tellest my wanderings: put thou my tears into thy bottle: are they not in thy book? Psalm 56:8 King James Version
Written by King David when he fled to the cave of Adullam, isolated and alone and regrouping. This idea of the wandering of peoples associated with the collecting their tears. Where tears become a metaphor for the transience of fleeing; offered from both the bereft (displaced) and the bereaved. Which in the New Living Version (1996) softened and blankly elucidated, it becomes:
You keep track of all my sorrows
You have collected all my tears in your bottle.
You have recorded each one in your book.
All this idea of wandering has vanished in this modern version, the concealment of transience seen over and again. In simplifying these words, these biblical scholars, appeal to a contemporary society, which puts stone upon stone upon brick. We have bricked ourselves in; built a wall against nature (and the wanderers) so tears become academic, sorrows noted and balanced. Yet in the original translation, David’s cry becomes a question, a plea to be remembered, one which recognises absence. And thus have we changed, with all of our wall building, and perimeters.
And what of the bottles, these ‘tear catchers’ which are both a theological conceit and a historical conceit. For indeed it wasn’t until the 19th century that the Victorians, of course, pulled these words into another deceit in their cult of mourning. Pouring David’s tears, the wanderer’s tears, into these grave bound bottles, to lay stilled beneath the earth. Archaeologists however, are more or less agreed, that these bottles contained only unguents and balms, associated with burial rituals.
The Victorians, who first commodified mourning though its fetishisation, who gathered jet (formed over millions of years from the driftwood of the Araucaria tree) on the Whitby shores, and wove hair into bracelets and lockets. These pioneers of visible, commercial grief, who plundered the natural world in its pursuit, pushing bird species to near extinction, within this seemed to lay down the mechanism for surrealism, for the postmodern, where each thing has many parts and many lies and many truths hid within it.